On the peer-review process

Authors

  • Raul Sanchez-Lopez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51445/sja.auditio.vol5.2021.0076

Keywords:

peer-review

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Visibility and Altmetrics

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
353
Views
519
Downloads
872
Total
Downloads by format:
PDF (Español (España)) 163 Texto (Español (España)) 221 PDF 55 Full Text 80

References

Annesley, T.M. (2011). Top 10 tips for responding to reviewer and editor comments. Clinical Chemistry, 57(4), 551–554. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.162388

Kelly, J., Sadeghieh, T., & Adeli, K. (2014). Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. EJIFCC, 25(3), 227–243.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2019). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals.

PLOS ONE "How to write a peer-review". Internet Archive Link:

https://web.archive.org/web/20210812190830/https:/plos.org/resource/how-to-write-a-peer-review/

Yousuf Al-Mousawi (2020) "A brief history of peer-review". F1000 Blog entry Link

Sobre el proceso de revision por pares

Published

2021-08-31

How to Cite

Sanchez-Lopez, R. (2021). On the peer-review process. Auditio , 5(2), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.51445/sja.auditio.vol5.2021.0076

Issue

Section

Editorials and Communications

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)